Establishment of Imprinted Methylation Patterns during Development
Abstract
Several model explanations have been proposed for the evolutionary acquisition of genomic imprinting as a developmental control mechanism in mammals (Moore and Haig 1991; Barlow 1993; Varmuza and Mann 1994). One of these models (Moore and Haig 1991) suggests that imprinting might have evolved in mammals because of the conflicting “interests” of maternal and paternal genes within the embryo. This model proposes that paternally expressed genes promote embryonic growth, whereas maternal genes act to restrain the use of maternal resources. A suitable example that corroborates this argument is the paternally expressed Igf2 gene and its counterpart, maternally expressed receptor (Igf2r). The different contribution to the embryonic phenotype of paternal and maternal genes had in fact been demonstrated in parthenogenetic and androgenetic embryos. Although the development of extraembryonic tissues in parthenogenetic embryos harboring two copies of the maternal genome is impaired, the development of the embryo proper is normal. In contrast, the embryo proper in androgenones...
Full Text:
PDFDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/0.215-229